October
2004
BUY
TO LET TAX PLANNING
Individuals thinking about entering the buy-to-let property
market should make themselves aware of the tax implications
of renting out to make the most of their investment, as
Steve Mitchell, project manager at Acumen Accountants
& Advisors in Aberdeen and Peterhead, explains.
There
are two main tax liabilities for those in the buy-to-let
arena: tax on rent and tax if a property is sold for more
than it was bought. The type of taxes and allowances available
to buy-to-let homebuyers directly depends on the ownership
status of the property. There are four main models of
ownership, each of which have tax advantages and disadvantages:
1.
Property owned by individual(s) where rental income is
taken as individual income. Landlords in this situation
will be able to use the annual capital gains allowance
(currently £8,200) to offset against any gain when
the property is sold. The main disadvantage is that rental
income will be added to the landlord’s other income
and will be subject to Income Tax at rates of up to 40%.
2.
Property owned by a company where rental income is taken
as company income. Here the main benefit is that rental
income will be subject to Corporation Tax and the rates
of this will probably be less than Income Tax. The landlord,
however, will not be able to use the annual capital gains
allowance to offset against any gain when the property
is sold.
3.
Property owned by individual(s) where rental income is
channelled through a company to become company income.
In this situation rental income will again be subject
to Corporation Tax, but these rates will probably be less
than Income Tax. The landlord will also be able to use
the annual capital gains allowance to offset against any
gain when the property is sold. The main disadvantage
is that the landlord will face an increased administrative
burden of running a company, as well as organising leases.
4.
Property owned by a pension fund and rental income taken
as income to the pension fund. The principle benefit with
this situation is that rental income will not be subject
to tax within the pension fund. In addition there will
be no tax on the gain when the property is sold. The disadvantage
is that the regulations do not permit holding residential
property within a pension fund, although this is currently
under review. The expectation is that borrowing powers
of pension funds will be significantly restricted in 2006
and this will be another factor to consider.
If
the wrong option is chosen, the landlord will pay more
tax than is necessary, therefore it is advisable to think
carefully about the options available. When choosing which
of the above four main options is preferable, individuals
should bear in mind:
•
the length of time the landlord intends to hold the properties
• the amount of borrowing required
• the level and type of other income the landlord
may have
• whether or not the landlord already has a company
Individuals
contemplating getting onto the buy-to-let property market
would be well advised to speak to a qualified accountant
about the taxation implications of renting out. Acumen
can be contacted on 01224 573904 and the website can be
accessed at www.acumen.info.